It is Sunday, December 14 and there are only 11 days
until Christmas! It’s hard to believe that we
are that close and I have not started baking yet. Fortunately, I have already stocked up on
preservatives like guar gum, so I will still be able to eat my cookies in
February. Today we remember the
birthdays of Nostradamus, Richard Batka and Lee Remick. On this day in 872, John VIII began his reign as
Catholic Pope, in 1819 Alabama was admitted as the 22nd state and in
1955 the Tappan Zee Bridge in New York opened to traffic. In El Salvador it is Revolution Day, in
Turkey it is the Festival of Mevlana-Jeladdin Rumi and in Alabama it is
Admission Day.
We took a few days to go visit our friend Pat down the
shore, recently. It was great to see
her, as always and we had a great time, as always. On the way home, we were passed by a county
sheriff car that stated that it was part of the Criminalistic Investigation
Unit. I had never heard of the word
criminalistic and assumed it was an error.
I reasoned that since the word linguistics meant the study of human
language, criminalistic meant the study of criminals. That meant that criminalistic investigation
was from the Department of Redundancy Department and was the investigation of
the study of criminals.
The lovely Elaine and I had a great time deriding the person
who developed the title. It turns out I
was wrong. Criminalistic is a real word
which means the application of scientific techniques in collecting and
analyzing physical evidence in criminal cases.
So you see that you can learn new things every day if you are open to
the opportunity.
Last week I mentioned the baked goods of the season and the
problems I had dealing with them as a diabetic.
I thought I might go a little further into the subject, just to give you
an idea of the difficulties the average person has in dealing with this problem. Both the lovely Elaine and I are type 2
diabetics. When we were first diagnosed,
we went to a nutritionist who gave us some good advice on how to handle our
eating habits so we could keep the problem under control. She gave us good guidance on what we could
and could not eat. We could not eat many
of the foods we liked, we had to limit the amounts of the ones we could eat and
we could not eat anything that resembled tasty.
We were basically limited to cardboard and celery.
We tried like crazy to adapt to the new regimen and were
successful for some time. Through
careful monitoring of our diet, the lovely Elaine was able to control her sugar
numbers without using medication and I was able to keep my numbers in check
using only one medication. I stopped
using sugar in my coffee and switched to an artificial sweetener. We were good about eating salads and avoiding
what our doctor referred to as “white food” – white rice, white bread, pasta,
etc. We were careful to create menus
that afforded us the nutritional benefits we needed, while giving us the
illusion that we were enjoying the food we were eating. The problem is that you can only eat chicken
so many ways before you decide that you have had it.
What makes everything more difficult is that for every
solution that one “expert” comes up with, there is another one who tells you
that what you are doing is wrong and you should be doing something
different. Our original nutritionist
said that the big thing was to watch our intake of carbs, because they convert
to sugar. We also read that you should
count the net carbs – that is the number of carbs minus the ones from
fiber. We read more recently that you
need to consider all the carbs and not deduct the fiber. The lovely Elaine tried another nutritionist,
recently, who told her that you didn’t need to be so conscious of carbs.
I read a number of articles that have told me that I should
not be using the artificial sweetener that I have been using because it has
adverse affects on your health and can actually raise your sugar numbers. The nutritionist said that if you are not
using that much (less than eight packets a day) it is not a problem. What makes things even more confusing is that
you really have no idea who to listen to or what to do.
Recently, our doctor had us do a test that monitored our
glucose over a four day period. We were
supposed to test ourselves four times a day – prior to each meal and just
before going to bed. We were also
supposed to list what we had to eat at each meal. I am not sure what the value of that
was. I could see testing myself after a
meal to see how what I ate affected my sugar.
But I did not see what the value was of testing before eating if I
wasn’t testing again just after eating.
What makes this whole thing even more interesting is that a couple times
I tested myself just before going to bed; then I tested in the morning before
breakfast and found that my number was higher – without having had anything to
eat after testing at night. Go figure!
What it comes down to is that no one really has any
solutions to the problem. I am taking
three different medications for my diabetes.
I have altered, somewhat, what I am eating in an effort to control my
sugar intake. My numbers continue to
fluctuate and depending on which expert I choose to read this week I am doing
or not doing the right things. I try to
watch sodium intake, because someone said that was good, someone else said it
is bad to limit sodium too much. I have
eaten white rice and not seen any major jump in my number and have seen an
increase after eating grilled chicken salad and brown rice.
So what it comes down to is that I am going to eat the
cookies and candy and other goodies this Christmas and will see what
happens. My guess is that I will continue
to have issues, will continue to take my medications and will continue to be
befuddled by all the expert opinions that are out there.
This week our fact tells us that, at one time, the Romans
used urine to whiten their teeth. It
supposedly worked. I guess this was what
necessitated the invention of mouthwash.
I also imagine this was originally where the phrase “potty mouth” came
from.
No comments:
Post a Comment